sh!t I do
(Ongoing)
These composited digital photographs depict domestic scenes of a mother engaged in chores. She performs mundane tasks, often multitasking or juggling personal work with care work, fulfilling her family's needs while socializing her daughters in response to the current socio-political milieu. She meets the viewer's gaze, insisting on acknowledgment of her labor and its value. For her, the domestic sphere is a site for resistance.
Some objects in these household scenes are necessary evils of our modern lifestyles, while others allude to a bi-cultural home. I use symbolism to suggest ideas or attributes. Flowers bloom over young girls who are coming of age, as their mother tends to their evolving needs. Outfits created with Indian Rupees and embellished with digitally drawn lace are intended to give the impression of a comfortable life. But, although it may seem to an onlooker that all is well, the situation may warrant deeper consideration.
Every day, mothers do wide-ranging physical, mental, and emotional work– programming their children’s present and future while constantly responding to the environment where they are raising a family. Sara Ruddick called this Maternal Thinking. She proposed that mothering delivers profound socio-political and economic significance and deserves critical evaluation.
Inspired by Ruddick’s philosophy and using myself as a subject in the series, Sh!t I Do, I composite digital photographs to create domestic scenes depicting a mother engaged in chores. She performs mundane tasks, often multitasking or juggling personal work with care work, fulfilling her family's needs while socializing her daughters in response to the current socio-political milieu. She meets the viewer's gaze, insisting on acknowledgment of her labor and its value. For her, the domestic sphere is a site for resistance.
Some objects in these household scenes are necessary evils of our modern lifestyles, while others allude to a bi-cultural home. I use symbolism to suggest ideas or attributes. Flowers bloom over young girls who are coming of age, as their mother tends to their evolving needs. Outfits created with Indian Rupees and embellished with digitally drawn lace are intended to give the impression of a comfortable (royal) life. But, although it may seem to an onlooker that all is well, the situation may warrant deeper consideration. The currency used is, in fact, demonetized.** Its lack of value is meant to seem absurd and lead the viewer to contemplate the value of motherwork, or further, that non-recognition of such labor can lead to a devaluation of one’s self-worth.
Feminist progress got us to the point of more or less equal pay, but today pay inequality is largely on account of a motherhood gap because the brunt of care work still falls primarily on mothers. In a society where power is synonymous with capital, care work is relegated to invisibility, often adversely affecting caregivers’ financial, mental, and physical health. This project encourages dialogue about mothering as thoughtful, value-generating work that responds to and contributes to society.
**The ₹500 bills used in the making of this project were gifts I received, on visits back home to Delhi, that were subsequently stripped of their legal tender in 2016 by the Indian government. There is a tradition in India to give cash as gifts, as it is considered more useful than objects that may be superfluous. This cultural practice perhaps stems from the fact that historically most Indian women, whether they are housewives or work outside the home, are not allowed financial freedom without male consent. Therefore, it is a common practice for women to stash bills in their homes, often without the knowledge of their spouses. In 2016 the ₹500 and ₹1,000 bills were demonetized by the Indian government. It has since been found that, as a result of the sudden demonetization, many Indian women were affected adversely and disproportionately.
Add your own content here. Click to edit.